MOF Issues
----------

Having looked at a proposal for the MOF2 core, i've decided
that I don't want to implement the entire thing. I did that
in the last version and it turned out to not get me anything
overly useful. Instead, I'm going to let the OMF core serve
as the facilities and capabilities defined in the MOF. It
should be a relatively "simple" task to turn around and implement
a "real" MOF at a later date. In fact, I'm going to have to
if I true meta-object relationships.

MOF-to-OMF Mapping
------------------

Despite the fact that the MOF-to-IDL mapping describes this
phenomenally large mapping onto the CORBA Component Model
(CCM), I'm _not_ going to follow that. I've always believed
that a) CORBA is just too heavy of an object model and b)
trying to duplicate a component model in C++ when I just
want something relatively light and useable is a ridiculous
waste of time. So, instead of building some desparately
complex implementation that attempts to follow the IDL
mapping, this implementation will be very similar in nature
to the previous implementation. Simple classes that implement
some useful attributes and methods related through inheritance.
